- 10/30/2009 6:33 PM
-
permalink
fenderhutz wrote:STAY FAR AWAY from this Netbook if you do anything Flash based. Most Internet games, video, and applications are flash based and the Intel 500 chipset is a trainwreck for those applications. I bought this exact netbook and returned it twice because I thought it was just a fluke. After researching the issue the INTEL GMA 500 chipset is a horrible joke. It cannot even run Peggle (just an example) without choppy video and Peggle isn't exactly an intensive application.
Be warned.
Definitely valid feedback, though from my perspective flash is a horrible joke. That said, I agree that there is lots of fun stuff out there implemented in flash, and the GMA500's suckitude for that purpose is well-documented.
it's a woot thing, you wouldn't understand
- 10/30/2009 6:48 PM
-
permalink
VIDEOSENSATIONS wrote:why acer did ya put the cheap 1.33 mhz processor
why not the n270 1.6 atom
bad deal sorry
Because they want to sell it w/ XP, and Microsloth won't allow them to if it has a processor over 1.5 GHz AND and screen over 11". So, they found a CPU that could perform on par with a 1.6GHz atom N270, even though it's only clocked at 1.33GHz.
Here's a news flash for you: A 2.4 GHz Core i5 is much faster than a 3 GHz Pentium.
Anyway, this is a good, not great deal on a really sweet netbook.
it's a woot thing, you wouldn't understand
- 10/30/2009 6:57 PM
-
permalink
jreddington wrote:Ah, but the 6 cell will make it heavier without appreciably affecting aerodynamics. Yes, it will still initially accellerate at 32 ft./sec./sec., but terminal velocity will be higher with the 6 cell.
Now if you were in the vaccum of the moon, now both would hit the ground at the same time.
How this is not a quality post is beyond me...awesome!
it's a woot thing, you wouldn't understand
- 10/30/2009 6:59 PM
-
permalink
CorinChellberg wrote:I could be wrong here, but I don't think the 1.33 ghz Atom is going to do a very good job playing back 720p on Hulu or anywhere else for that matter.
Actually, that would be more a function of the graphics chipset than the CPU, and in this case it is the GMA 500, which means flash will suck and everything else will be reasonably good.
it's a woot thing, you wouldn't understand
- 10/30/2009 7:00 PM
-
permalink
donnytong wrote:hmmm... I was way too lazy to read all of the thread and I'm sure somebody already gave their review. Nonetheless, I recently purchased this model netbook from overstock brand new. The version I bought came with 2gb ram, 250 gb hard drive, vista home basic and 3 cell battery. Right out of the box, the netbook is extremely sluggish. After updating all of the microsoft vista updates, disabling some of the programs during start up and setting the battery on high performance, it works much better. Is it as good as a notebook/laptop? NO... not at all. Will it suffice for multi-tasking while surfing the net, running a word doc and excel? Yep. It'll do the job.
Here are a couple of things I've noticed:
1) opening the browser takes a couple of seconds. A little longer than I would like.
2) switching between apps lags.
3) battery life for the 3 cell set at high performance (shortest battery life option), wifi on, web surfing and word doc last a little over 3 hrs.
4) I've experienced 2 times the netbook blacking out. Screen went totally black like it went to sleep mode. I can hear the drive still running. But a simple restart solved the problem.
In my experience, those deficiencies are more attributable to trying to run Vista (bloated, slow, inefficient) on a hardware platform it was never designed for to begin with. I think with XP your experience would have been much better.
it's a woot thing, you wouldn't understand
- 10/30/2009 7:34 PM
-
permalink
junkshow wrote:Definitely valid feedback, though from my perspective flash is a horrible joke. That said, I agree that there is lots of fun stuff out there implemented in flash, and the GMA500's suckitude for that purpose is well-documented.
true dat youngblood
Mortiki Means "Wizard"
#1 wooter! according to woot :-) 334 woots purchased and counting...over $130,000.00 spent
First woot: (Timex T58501 Ironman Triathlon Speed + Distance GPS Watch)
last woot: eMachines 1.6Ghz Desktop Computer 10/21/09 qty 3
- 10/31/2009 11:56 PM
-
permalink
I really hope someone can clear up some information for me. When woot says "we'll ship in 5 business days", does that mean the package will leave the warehouse or wherever in 5 days, or it will be at my house in 5 days?I've asked three people around me and got a completely unrelated answer each time..
Current WootDrobe:
Lament of the Kiwi
Dental Damage
The Night Shift
- 11/1/2009 9:29 AM
-
permalink
ILGal wrote:Leaves their warehouse within 5 BUSINESS days; gets to you at some later date...faster if shipped FedEx, not so fast if shipped SmartPost.
I guess I'm getting mine later.. I never saw an option for fedex/overnight like they do the shirts.. patience is a virtue I guess.. but OK, thanks for clearing that up for me
Current WootDrobe:
Lament of the Kiwi
Dental Damage
The Night Shift